The Washington Treaty of 1922, designed to head off a potentially dangerous arms race between the major naval powers, agreed to legally binding limits on the numbers and sizes of the principal warship types. In doing so, it introduced a new constraint into naval architecture and sponsored many ingenious attempts to maximise the power of ships built within those restrictions. It effectively banned the construction of new battleships for a decade, but threw greater emphasis on large cruisers. This much is broadly understood by anyone with an interest in warships, but both the wider context of the treaty and the detail ramifications of its provisions are little understood. The approach of this book is novel in combining coverage of the political and strategic background of the treaty – and the subsequent London Treaty of 1930 – with analysis of exactly how the navies of Britain, the USA, Japan, France and Italy responded, in terms of the types of warships they built and the precise characteristics of those designs. This was not just a matter of capital ships and cruisers, but also influenced the development of super-destroyers and large submarines. Now warship enthusiasts and historians can understand fully the rationale behind much of inter-war naval procurement. The Washington Treaty was a watershed, and this book provides an important insight into its full significance.
WARSHIPS AFTER WASHINGTON The Development of the Five Major Fleets 1922-1930
John Jordan, editor of the prestigious naval annual “Warship”, has compressed shrewd and incisive analysis and a superb commentary into this book which deftly combines text, drawings and tables. The adoption in 1922 of the Washington Treaty by Britain, the United States, Japan, France and Italy, then the world’s five major naval powers was a watershed. This Treaty limited each signatory nation’s total tonnage of certain categories of warship and the displacement of some individual types of ship.